Processing math: 100%

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Lex total categories and Grothendieck toposes II

Next post in this series.

I said in the first post in this series that totally complete categories have a strong adjoint functor theorem.

Here is the adjoint functor theorem: if A and B are locally small categories, A is totally cocomplete and F: A\to B is a functor which preserves colimits of discrete fibrations with small fibres then F has a right adjoint.



Before indicating a proof of this result let us look at the adjoint functor theorem for posets.
If F:A\to B is an order preserving function, A is a complete poset and F preserves sups then F has a right adjoint U with U(b)=sup_{F(a)\leq b}(a).
proof Certainly U so defined has the property that if F(a)\leq b then a\leq U(b). But also since F preserves sup then FU(b)=F(sup_{F(a)\leq b}(a))=sup_{F(a)\leq b}F(a)\leq b and hence if a\leq U(b) then F(a)\leq FU(b)\leq b. Hence F(a)\leq b if and only if a\leq U(b). Notice that we used preservation of sups only for the sups in the definition of U.

There is a straightforward extension to categories of this result, namely a functor F:A\to B has a right adjoint if and only if for each b\in B the colimit colimit_{Fa\to b}a exists and is preserved by F. I have been imprecise about the diagram of the colimit - we will see a definition below.  Let's use this result to prove the adjoint functor theorem.

What we need to show is if A, B are locally small and A is totally complete then colimit_{Fa\to b}a is the colimit of a discrete fibration with small fibres.

Notice that the fact that A is totally complete suggest a possible adjoint to F, namely
B\xrightarrow{yoneda_B}PB\xrightarrow{PF}PA\xrightarrow{colimit}A
where by PA I mean Sets^{A^{op}}.
But PF(yoneda_B(b))=B(F(-),b)) so the suggested formula for U(b) is the colimit of the discrete fibration Elements(B(F(-),b))\to A corresponding to the functor B(F(-),b):A^{op}\to Sets.

What is this discrete fibration? Over a\in A the fibre is B(Fa,b), that is consists of arrows Fa\to b. Over \alpha:a_1\to a_2 there are arrows (f:Fa_1\to b)\to (g:Fa_2\to b) exactly when g F(\alpha) =f. But this is exactly the diagram I intended for colim_{Fa\to b}(a)=U(b). Certainly this colimit exists and we have the theorem.

I am busy today, so I will give examples of the use of this theorem in producing constructions in lex total categories next time.

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home